<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TransAccel Group &#187; Leadership</title>
	<atom:link href="https://transaccelgroup.com/category/leadership/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://transaccelgroup.com</link>
	<description>Improving IT Processes &#38; Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2018 13:13:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Transparency &amp; Cost Optimization… Bank on it!!</title>
		<link>https://transaccelgroup.com/2014/06/19/transparency-cost-optimization-bank-on-it/</link>
		<comments>https://transaccelgroup.com/2014/06/19/transparency-cost-optimization-bank-on-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2014 19:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Ebersole]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alignment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discipline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flexibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ws2.telnex.us/~transaccelgroup/?p=6012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my last blog I spoke about the four principles that lead to better Cost Optimization. They were Transparency, Flexibility, Simplification and Discipline. I would like to take this opportunity to discuss Transparency in more detail. How many times has IT management staff felt that their business partners don’t appreciate or understand the effort, time and money required to satisfy a business demand? On the other hand, how many times do you think business partners wonder if IT is focusing on the correct enterprise initiatives, or why their requests are not satisfied to their expectation level? The answer? Too many times to count on both hands. Without transparency, the worst fears of both sides and all stakeholders become a reality. Webster defines Transparency as “the quality that makes something obvious or easy to understand.” At TransAccel, we view Transparency as a prerequisite for making better supply and demand decisions that are based on cutting the right costs in the right way, while maintaining what is most valuable to the organization. With transparency, the IT organization can participate in valuable discussions that balance costs with IT benefits. Transparency should exist across all sectors of IT – but especially crucial are: The first step toward Transparency is to divide IT services into two camps: those that support core (vital, no one else can do them) activities and operations, and those that could be outsourced if need be (non-core). Obviously, step one goes a long way in determining where resources and assets should be allocated (or not). For transparency and cost optimization to occur, defining and validating IT business services must be carried out, even if this is done through a series of incremental steps rather than a [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my last blog I spoke about the four principles that lead to better Cost Optimization. They were Transparency, Flexibility, Simplification and Discipline. I would like to take this opportunity to discuss Transparency in more detail.</p>
<p>How many times has IT management staff felt that their business partners don’t appreciate or understand the effort, time and money required to satisfy a business demand? On the other hand, how many times do you think business partners wonder if IT is focusing on the correct enterprise initiatives, or why their requests are not satisfied to their expectation level? The answer? Too many times to count on both hands. Without transparency, the worst fears of both sides and all stakeholders become a reality.</p>
<p>Webster defines Transparency as “the quality that makes something obvious or easy to understand.” At TransAccel, we view Transparency as a prerequisite for making better supply and demand decisions that are based on cutting the right costs in the right way, while maintaining what is most valuable to the organization. With transparency, the IT organization can participate in valuable discussions that balance costs with IT benefits.</p>
<p>Transparency should exist across all sectors of IT – but especially crucial are:</p>
<style type='text/css'>
  #checklist-1 li:before{color:#757575 !important; content:'\f111' }
	</style>
<ul id="checklist-1" class="list-icon circle-no list-icon-fa-circle">
<li>Portfolio management</li>
<li>IT budgeting, performance management, chargebacks and cost allocations</li>
<li>Measurement and benchmarking</li>
<li>Investment planning</li>
<li>IT service portfolios and catalogs</li>
</ul>

The first step toward Transparency is to divide IT services into two camps: those that support core (vital, no one else can do them) activities and operations, and those that could be outsourced if need be (non-core). Obviously, step one goes a long way in determining where resources and assets should be allocated (or not). For transparency and cost optimization to occur, defining and validating IT business services must be carried out, even if this is done through a series of incremental steps rather than a complete transformation.</p>
<p>Poor Transparency exists when the value and tradeoffs associated with IT spending are not quantitatively discussed within the larger context of business strategy and goals. Typical results of this information disconnect are inaccurate budget forecasting, inefficient investment planning, and the wrong projects draining away resources, to name a few. Another consequence? Prior optimization goals are often repeated or even increased in following years.</p>
<p>Benefits of Transparency include better demand and supply management, budget forecasting, investment planning, increased governance, respect from business partners, identification of business-valued initiatives, and the elimination of non-core and non-differentiating resource-sapping projects.</p>
<p>The goal is to run IT like a business. TransAccel would be happy to assist your organization with aligning IT services and activities to business goals, and mapping those services to interdependencies and resource requirements.</p>
<p>As organizations strive to achieve leaner and more cost effective IT departments, Transparency is one of four basic cost optimization principles that will allow you to drop additional coins into your piggy bank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://transaccelgroup.com/2014/06/19/transparency-cost-optimization-bank-on-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Increasing IT maturity: Jumping the (very high) Level 2 hurdle</title>
		<link>https://transaccelgroup.com/2013/10/31/increasing-it-maturity-jumping-the-very-high-level-2-hurdle/</link>
		<comments>https://transaccelgroup.com/2013/10/31/increasing-it-maturity-jumping-the-very-high-level-2-hurdle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 18:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Lotier]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT maturity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trust]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ws2.telnex.us/~transaccelgroup/?p=6040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I often describe the Level 2 hurdle as the highest and hardest to jump over. I’ve witnessed many an IT organization trip and fall, ending up with the proverbial skinned knee. The biggest tripping point is also the most common one: IT leaders are too accustomed to managing “noise.” The inclination is often to do something radical—like a reorg—in a desperate attempt to stop the noise. Can you start with a reorganization? Sure. But this only works for organizations at a very high level of maturity, where processes are well instituted. Likewise, it can also work for organizations at a very low level of maturity that lack process rigor, but it will often result in sub-optimization. It’s not about moving things around, it’s about doing things differently. Getting past Level 2 requires a three-pronged approach: Stop managing and start leading. This one’s not easy. Leaders at this level have worked very hard to get where they are. They’re confident in what they’re doing and they’re good at it. But when things start to change, the heroics stop mattering to the business and the noise begins, and it only gets louder as time passes. Often leaders make one of two decisions: 1) comply with whatever the business says, or 2) leave. But there is a third choice and it’s to lead, step up, break free from the rut of managing noise, and take the organization to a new place. Make processes efficient, then effective. Organizations at a Level 2 already have many processes that are installed. Their focus needs to be on making them more efficient, and then effective. Gaining efficiency comes through repeating the process numerous times and measuring the results to continuously improve. As [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I often describe the Level 2 hurdle as the highest and hardest to jump over. I’ve witnessed many an IT organization trip and fall, ending up with the proverbial skinned knee. The biggest tripping point is also the most common one: IT leaders are too accustomed to managing “noise.”</p>
<p>The inclination is often to do something radical—like a reorg—in a desperate attempt to stop the noise. Can you start with a reorganization? Sure. But this only works for organizations at a very high level of maturity, where processes are well instituted. Likewise, it can also work for organizations at a very low level of maturity that lack process rigor, but it will often result in sub-optimization. <i>It’s not about moving things around, it’s about doing things differently.</i></p>
<p>Getting past Level 2 requires a three-pronged approach:</p>
<ol>
<li><b>Stop managing and start leading.</b> This one’s not easy. Leaders at this level have worked very hard to get where they are. They’re confident in what they’re doing and they’re good at it. But when things start to change, the heroics stop mattering to the business and the noise begins, and it only gets louder as time passes. Often leaders make one of two decisions: 1) comply with whatever the business says, or 2) leave. But there is a third choice and it’s to lead, step up, break free from the rut of managing noise, and take the organization to a new place.</li>
<li><b>Make processes efficient, then effective.</b> Organizations at a Level 2 already have many processes that are installed. Their focus needs to be on making them more efficient, and then effective. Gaining efficiency comes through repeating the process numerous times and measuring the results to continuously improve. As every good designer/architect knows, “form follows function.”  This principle, associated with modern architecture and industrial design in the 20th century, says that the shape of a building or object should be primarily based upon its intended function or purpose.</li>
<li><b>Build trust.</b> The underlying problem facing Level 2 IT organizations: Their internal clients don’t trust them. They lack credibility. It’s harsh, but it’s true. Level 2 organizations should invest in building a strong group of business relationship managers (BRMs, aka account managers). The ultimate sign of a strong BRM is when the business can’t tell if they’re talking to an IT person or another business person. So what constitutes a good BRM? What are the core competencies every BRM needs?</li>
</ol>
<ul>
<ul>
<li><b>Business acumen<br />
</b>A good BRM should speak the business’ language and be effective at translating business needs into IT demand and vice versa.</li>
<li><b>Communication skills  to manage expectations<br />
</b>Internal customers should feel their BRM keeps them informed and up-to-date on the status of their request and projects.</li>
<li><b>Strategic planning<br />
</b>A BRM should be capable of joint account planning, e.g., collaborate with the business to proactively solve business problems rather than respond to problems after they arise.</li>
<li><b>Facilitation<br />
</b>A BRM should be effective at facilitating outcomes, including decision making, consensus building, negotiation and conflict resolution.</li>
</ul>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://transaccelgroup.com/2013/10/31/increasing-it-maturity-jumping-the-very-high-level-2-hurdle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
